Leeds: Barcelona launch Raphinha offer

Barcelona have now reportedly made a whopping €55m (£46.2m) offer for Leeds United star Raphinha.

The Lowdown: Relegation release clause

The Whites are currently out of the bottom three but are still in serious danger of dropping back down to the Championship. Jesse Marsch’s side travel to Brentford on the final day, with Burnley currently a point behind with a game in hand.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-leeds-united-updates-3/” title=”Latest Leeds United updates!” poster=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/cropped-2022-03-10T184055Z_1834933207_UP1EI3A1FW561_RTRMADP_3_SOCCER-ENGLAND-LEE-AVA-REPORT-1-scaled-1.jpg” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

Should Leeds suffer relegation, star forward Raphinha will have a €25m (£21m) release clause activated. The Brazilian’s agent Deco has been in advanced talks with Barcelona since March over a five-year deal at the Nou Camp, and it looks as if the La Liga giants have now firmed up their interest with a formal offer.

The Latest: Formal offer made

Sport Witness relayed an update from UOL regarding Barcelona and Raphinha on Monday.

They claimed that the Catalan giants have now made an offer worth an initial €55m (£46.2m), with €10m (£8.4m) worth of performance add-ons included. The report added that Leeds have yet to respond to the offer, with all their focus on remaining in the Premier League.

The Verdict: Surprise

Should this report prove accurate, then Andrea Radrizzani and the 49ers Enterprises have a big decision to make over the coming days.

If things go horribly wrong this weekend, then you’d expect that Raphinha will leave for around £21m and that Barcelona’s reported €55m offer will be withdrawn, so it’s certainly a surprise to see such an offer just days before the club’s fate is sealed one way or another.

It looks as if the La Liga club want to get a deal wrapped up as soon as possible and have made an offer more than double that of the player’s relegation release clause, which could be the best the Whites can get – should they bite the bullet and accept it now?

In other news: Leeds journalist claims ‘incredible’ Orta signing may now leave with Phillips and Raphinha this summer

Kohli walks the Ponting path

Leaders of a winning team, check. Blessed with a strong bowling attack, check. Unstoppable run-machines, double check

Karthik Krishnaswamy in Nagpur26-Nov-20172:00

Chopra: Kohli looked in complete control

The Nagpur Test against Sri Lanka is Virat Kohli’s 62nd and Cheteshwar Pujara’s 53rd. They have both been part of 30 Indian wins, and a 31st seems imminent. Pujara’s 143 here could be his 10th hundred in a Test win, and Kohli’s 213 his ninth.Already, Pujara has more hundreds in Test wins than all other Indian batsmen barring Sachin Tendulkar (20) and Rahul Dravid (15), and it looks like Kohli won’t be tied with Virender Sehwag for too much longer.Think about all the greats of Indian batting who made hundreds all over the world, and only rarely made one in a winning cause. Sunil Gavaskar scored 34 Test hundreds, more than anyone else for a long, long time, but only six – six! – in Indian wins.Test-match batsmen are moulded by fate, the contours of their innings shaped by the teams they were destined to play for. Unlike any generation of Indian batsmen before them, the current one plays for a team habituated to winning, a team that has won 20 of its last 27 Tests.Bowlers win Test matches. Batsmen do what they can to better their team’s position – strengthen a good one, rectify a bad one, turn parity to superiority.At various points during this run of 27 Tests, Pujara and Kohli have had to fight challenging conditions or good bowling attacks or bat in difficult situations. Their runs have often turned these situations around.But Pujara and Kohli have found themselves batting when India are frontrunners far more often than occupants of Indian line-ups past. Batting is not necessarily easy in these situations – Kohli’s 81 in Visakhapatnam, for instance, came when India had a first-innings lead of 200, but it was nonetheless a masterpiece on a pitch with treacherous low bounce – but quite often the bowlers are weary and the fields spread out.This is perhaps truer in the case of Kohli. During their run of 20 wins in 27 Tests, India’s average first-wicket partnership has been 35.54, while their average second-wicket stand has been a best-in-the-world 60.40. This means, crudely, that the average Kohli innings has begun with the scorecard reading 96 for 2.So, even some of his best efforts in this period, were an elaboration of the solid foundations laid by the batsmen above him. When he made his 235 in Mumbai, he walked in with India 146 for 2 in response to England’s first-innings 400. Plenty of work still needed to be done, but it wasn’t 46 for 2.Virat Kohli plays a strong bottom-handed whip for six•BCCIKohli was often compared to Ricky Ponting early in his career, for his confrontational attitude more than anything. Now it’s perhaps even more apt: he is the alpha batsman in a team that wins often, and if Ponting followed one of Test cricket’s great opening pairs into the middle, Kohli often follows the incredibly prolific second-wicket pair of M Vijay and Pujara.For most of their careers, Brian Lara didn’t have either a match-winning bowling attack around him or top-class batting support, while Tendulkar had one but not the other; Ponting had both. So does Kohli, at least in this phase of his career.Like so many Ponting hundreds, Kohli’s double in Nagpur – his fifth overall – was an innings of relentless, remorseless feasting on an already wilting opposition. It was exactly what he had to do, and it was exactly what he did. When he walked in, India were already in the lead and only two down. He came in after a second-wicket stand of 209. Right from the time he arrived, he was faced with damage-limitation fields.But even in those circumstances, it takes an exceptional batsman to score 213 seemingly risk-free runs at a strike-rate close to 80. When he was at the crease, the batsmen at the other end, and extras, scored 154 off 299 balls – that’s a strike-rate of 51.51.This is what Kohli can do. He took a lot of singles and twos to fielders in the deep, but often he made them possible, usually by taking balls from off stump or just outside and working them into leg-side gaps. Every now and then he put away a bad or marginally bad ball, but he also manufactured boundaries off reasonably good ones.A couple of examples stood out on day three, both against Dilruwan Perera’s offspin. On 111, he received an off-stump ball that pitched just short of a good length; Kohli rocked back and created just enough room for his arms to extend into a punch that beat mid-off diving to his right. On 188, he leaned forward to a flighted, good-length ball pitching two feet outside off stump and used all the power in his bottom wrist to whip it hard and flat over the midwicket boundary.Sri Lanka could find no way to stop him or slow him down, and in the end they just crossed their fingers and waited for a mistake. Ponting gave numerous oppositions this feeling in his pomp; over the last couple of years, Kohli has done this too.In just a few weeks, though, India will begin a journey that will test just how good they are. It will ask their bowlers if they can be just as threatening away from their comfort zone, and their top three if they can be just as solid. The answers to those two questions will shape the questions that Kohli is asked.

Bumrah's tragicomic fourth over

Plays of the day from the first ODI between Zimbabwe and India at the Harare Sports Club

Karthik Krishnaswamy11-Jun-2016The dropJasprit Bumrah had taken a wicket in his second over, skidding one on from just back of a length to bowl the leaden-footed Chamu Chibhabha. Now, starting his fourth over with figures of 3-2-2-1, he angled one across the left-handed Craig Ervine, pitching it on the perfect length. It was full, inviting the batsman forward, but not full enough to drive. Ervine took the bait, and edged thickly, straight into the lap of KL Rahul at second slip, and straight out, as he grabbed at the ball instead of letting it come to him.The delayed free-hitThe drop did not affect Bumrah’s outward composure – barely anything changes his placid expression – but perhaps it affected him inwardly, and he overstepped while bowling his next ball. Then, running in to deliver a free-hit, he sent down a massive leg-side wide, which left a diving MS Dhoni sprawled helplessly as the ball ran away to the boundary.The actual free-hitBumrah ran in again, and delivered a length ball. Ervine slogged, looking to hit over midwicket, and only managed a thick edge that swirled high in the air, dropping towards Barinder Sran rushing in from fine leg. Sran positioned himself under the ball, steadied himself, and let the ball slip through his fingers.Chibhabha v RayuduThe last time India toured Zimbabwe, Chibhabha was the home side’s best performer with the bat: he scored 157 runs at 52.33 in three ODIs, and 90 at 45.00 in two T20s. Rather more unexpectedly, he was also one of their brightest sparks with the ball, picking up four wickets at 26.75 in the ODI series. He came on in the 10th over of India’s innings on Saturday, and beat KL Rahul with his first ball. He kept finding late swing away from the right-handers, and in his second over he had Ambati Rayudu in plenty of bother. He kept pitching it just back of a length, and found a bit of extra bounce to go with the away movement. He beat Rayudu’s outside edge twice in succession, and then, after Rayudu managed to get forward to a slightly fuller one and block it, beat him again, opening him up completely.

The tournament of the short ball

The bouncer has turned out to be the weapon of choice for the leading bowlers of the World Cup so far

Brydon Coverdale17-Mar-2015″He is ducking but can’t duck. He is pulling but can’t pull. The hands move in slow motion for the pull, and the ball hits the glove to lob up to Dhoni.”That was India’s first wicket of this World Cup, vividly described by Sidharth Monga on ESPNcricinfo’s ball-by-ball commentary. The bowler was Mohammed Shami, the batsman was Younis Khan. The delivery, as you’ve no doubt gathered, was a fast, accurate bouncer. It is the type of ball that has dominated this World Cup, the most effective weapon of both aggression and defence.There could hardly be a better portrayal of how the bouncer has played on the minds of batsmen throughout this tournament. It is a World Cup. It is one-day cricket. Runs must be scored, bowlers must be dominated. Play the shot, the batsman tells himself. The other voice in his head says, these pitches are quick, save yourself. Does he trust Dr Jekyll or Mr Hide?It is not just the pace in the surfaces that has made the bumper so central to this campaign. At the last World Cup, five fielders were allowed outside the circle out of the Powerplays. Now it is four. At the last World Cup, only one ball was used at the start of an innings. Now it is one from each end. At the last World Cup, one bouncer per over was permitted. Now it is two.Consider those rule changes in combination. You are a captain. You can place only four men on the boundary. You have good fast bowlers at your disposal. Where do you put the fielders? What do you ask of your bowler? The yorker has long been the staple of one-day cricket containment. Better to err too full than too short, the commentators used to say. Now a low full toss is liable to go for six.

One of the most notable features of India’s bowling displays in this tournament has been their successful use of the bouncer. It is the equivalent of Australia heading to the subcontinent for a World Cup and spinning teams out

A low full toss might go nearly anywhere. But what if you bowl short? If your bowlers are fast enough and accurate enough, it is a much easier delivery to defend. A successful shot will likely go more or less square of the wicket, an unsuccessful one behind the batsman. And if he is good enough to hook for six on these quick pitches, with balls that stay hard longer, good luck to him.Over the past month, so many hooks have been skied you’d think Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was playing. Morne Morkel is South Africa’s leading wicket-taker in this tournament; around half of his breakthroughs have come from bouncers. That is perhaps not unusual for Morkel, given his natural style of bowling. But he is far from alone.One of the most notable features of India’s bowling displays in this tournament has been their successful use of the bouncer. It is the equivalent of Australia heading to the subcontinent for a World Cup and spinning teams out. It is all the more surprising given how insipid India’s attack was during the recent Tests in Australia.But after the Tests ended, there was a clear shift in India’s approach to net sessions. The fast men placed special emphasis on bowling their bouncers. The batsmen worked hard on facing them. It was like an unsaid acknowledgement that this would be an important aspect of a World Cup in Australia and New Zealand. And so it has proved.”Nobody expects my bouncer to come so fast because it skids as well,” Mohit Sharma said during this World Cup. “That’s a plus for me because my bouncer catches the batsmen off guard and as a result there will either be a top edge or they will get beaten. I have been hit for fours and sixes also off my bouncers, but that’s how it goes.”Mitchell Starc is the leading wicket-taker after the pool stage, with 16 victims, thanks largely to his swing. But his swing has been all the more effective because the threat of the bouncer is always there. It was notable that his first ball of the tournament was a bouncer, to Moeen Ali. So was his first ball against Scotland. From then on, it was in the minds of the batsmen.Duck, weave, ping: Sikandar Raza checks his helmet after wearing one in the match against UAE•AFPDale Steyn has likewise used the bouncer to good effect, and his dismissal of Ed Joyce in Canberra was a classic fast bowler’s one-two. Steyn’s bouncer pushed Joyce back, and his next ball was fuller and fast at 146kph. Joyce played away from his body with feet rooted to the crease, and sent an edge to first slip.The size of the fields in Australia adds to the danger – more so than in New Zealand, for a batsman must really connect with a bouncer in order to clear the boundary. Perhaps that is less evident at Adelaide Oval, where the square boundaries are shorter, but then again that is where India used the bumper effectively against Pakistan. It is also, as Pat Cummins noted this weekend, one of the quickest wickets right now.”Having all our games in Australia, I think the bounce is really important,” Cummins said. “You can bowl two of them an over and if you execute it well you can defend it pretty well or it can be a dot ball, which, especially towards the end of an innings, can be gold, so definitely something I think we’re going to continue using.”So too have Australia’s quarter-final opponents, Pakistan. Wahab Riaz, Mohammad Irfan, Sohail Khan – they have all used the bouncer to good effect in this campaign. As Osman Samiuddin wrote last week, Pakistan’s use of the bouncer is like when Indiana Jones resignedly takes out the gun on the guy with the sword. If their swing doesn’t work, their bouncer probably will.Field restrictions, two new balls, two bouncers per over – it has all combined to make this World Cup the tournament of the short ball. The idea of bouncers flying under the radar is about as oxymoronic as the term “tail-end batsman”. Until now, though, bouncers have perhaps not been given their due in one-day international cricket. But when India start bouncing out opponents at Adelaide Oval, you know something is up.

New Zealand's reliable 'sheriff'

BJ Watling’s 65 in the first innings against West Indies continued a year where he has cemented what had become a tricky position for New Zealand

Andrew McGlashan in Wellington12-Dec-2013There are a few in-form Test wicketkeeper-batsmen around the world. Brad Haddin is enjoying a wonderful Ashes campaign while AB de Villiers has adapted to his plethora of roles with South Africa to such an extent that he is currently the world’s No. 1 batsman.Then there is BJ Watling, who has been termed New Zealand’s ‘sheriff’ of their lower order. Over the past year he has settled into a role that had become a problem area for New Zealand since Brendon McCullum gave up the Test gloves in early 2010. Gareth Hopkins, Reece Young and Kruger van Wyk were all given decent opportunities to establish themselves without commanding the spot in the long term.Watling’s performance in Wellington followed a theme for the year. Against Bangladesh, in Chittagong, he added 127 for the last wicket with Trent Boult and today the pair skipped to 58 off 51 balls for the last wicket – Boult dominated with 38. The last four wickets in the first innings were worth 145 and in Chittagong, where Watling made his second Test hundred, they added 187.Corey Anderson said. “I think he’s just a smart cricketer. He takes that responsibility really well. He’s the sheriff of that lower order and he bats with guys and guys bat around him.”It’s nice to have guys chip in with 20s or 30s and Boulty obviously had 38 at the end there so it always helps. I guess it doesn’t demoralise an opposition team but it just saps, or takes, a little bit more energy out of them, knowing that they’re so close to finishing but they can’t finish the job. So it was nice to get that kind of score to give us a bit of a buffer.Watling, who began his Test career as a specialist batsman as both an opener and in the middle order, was earmarked for the keeper’s position when he made a hundred against Zimbabwe in Napier but on the eve of the following series against South Africa was withdrawn with a hip injury which gave van Wyk his opportunity.Van Wyk had nine Tests in a row, ending with a pair against Sri Lanka in Colombo, and Watling was restored for the tough assignment of the South Africa tour. Amid the rubble of New Zealand’s batting on that trip he made 42 in the second innings at Cape Town and twin 63s in Port Elizabeth. He has not looked back, scoring 576 runs this year which makes him the second-most prolific keeper-batsman behind de Villiers.Boult, too, is enjoying an impressive run, equalling the most runs by a New Zealand No. 11 and his average of 23 is the highest of players who have batted more than 10 times in the position. After surviving a dropped catch by Tino Best, which was parried for six, he took two boundaries and another six off Shane Shillingford then, with his confidence soaring, collected back-to-back fours off Best including an on drive. When Watling was bowled, it was tempting to suggest Boult had been denied another half-century. Chris Martin he certainly isn’t.

Swann admits to England frustration

How much fight a lower order shows can often be a window to the team spirit of a side, and Sri Lanka’s lower order have battled in both innings

Andrew McGlashan in Galle 28-Mar-2012Many things can lead to frustration in the sort of heat that Galle has produced during this Test match. High on that list is taking wickets with no-balls and not being able to remove lower-order batsmen as a result. For the second time in the game, England exerted unexpected energy trying to wrap up Sri Lanka’s innings.Both times a Jayawardene has been in the way. In the first innings it was an epic performance from Mahela and second time around a gusty innings from Prasanna, a nuggety cricketer who has blunted England in the past. He scored a hundred at Cardiff last year and a match-saving 120 against Pakistan in the UAE before succumbing to a hernia which has kept him out of action until now. Dinesh Chandimal has stood in impressively but Prasanna is a valuable player for Sri Lanka and to slot straight back in with 61 showed his fighting qualities.However, neither Mahela or Prasanna could have achieved the runs they scored without lower-order support. England would not have envisaged too many problems getting past Chanaka Welegedera or Suranga Lakmal. They have Test batting averages of nine and seven respectively, but between them in the second innings they soaked up 82 in partnerships of 40 and 47. That followed a first-innings effort of 54 when Welegedera accompanied Mahela. It could well prove the difference.How much fight a lower order shows can often be a window to the team spirit of a side. When two players resist so solidly it suggests that everyone is in it together. “England were frustrated and we hung in there,” Prasanna said. “Suranga and Chanaka batted very well, they knew what they had to do to help me.”England tried various tactics to break through, including a barrage of bouncers, but the pitch was slow enough to give batsmen, even tailenders, enough time to sway out of the line. It was one of those short balls that Prasanna top-edged back to Stuart Broad only for the delivery to be a clear no-ball when the umpire Rod Tucker asked for it to be checked on TV. The fact it cost England another 47 runs to close out the innings swayed the odds further in Sri Lanka’s favour.Graeme Swann was one of many Englishmen players getting redder in the face by the moment – but in his case not just because of the sun. When Prasanna lofted to deep midwicket, Samit Patel could not quite stay inside the boundary rope while taking the catch and it cost six. There was not much more Patel could have done, but England were desperate to get off the field.”Sure there’ve been moments of frustration,” Swann said. “As Englishmen we get very hot and bothered. That next 40 minutes hurt a little bit. You’re looking at a chase of 285-290 and we’re going to win this, to 330 where it’s maybe tipped back to a 50-50 game. Those 40-odd runs were very hot and bothering for all the fielders. As you saw we were at each other’s necks by the end.””We aren’t used to the heat and humidity and even though we’ve been here for three weeks, when things go against you like that it it’s human nature. Fortunately we have a few very calm heads out there, Strauss being one of them. At the drinks break he just told us it had gone and we had to work our socks off to get the last wicket and make sure we stopped dwelling on the fact that things could have ended earlier. He did a superb job like that.”Swann’s 6 for 82 in the first innings represented his second-best Test figures for England, a relief perhaps during a winter when he has often been outshone by other spin bowlers. He suggested that he had not been overly concerned. “It’s probably the best I have bowled for a while for England,” he said. “My personal view is that expectations of me have risen because of my performances so I am quite happy not to listen to people when they say I’m not bowling very well.”Although Andrew Strauss was just about able to keep control in the field, he won’t be able to do anything to change the course of the match. With the outstanding exception of Mahela Jayawardene, this has not been a good Test for top-order batsmen (although Jonathan Trott and Kevin Pietersen might yet change that) and Strauss’s ugly mow to midwicket was up there with the worst shots of the match.It is getting to the stage where his lack of runs – or, more accurately, his failure to convert starts – cannot be ignored. In the first innings he fell sweeping a full delivery against Rangana Herath and in the second innings he again fell trying to dominate him. In itself, the mindset to play positively should not be criticised, but trying to fetch a left-arm spinner out of the footmarks on a wearing third-day pitch can be. Strauss’s scoring areas appear to have become so pared down – to the cut and the work through midwicket against the spinner – that he is looking for a release somewhere.As you would expect, though, the team has nothing but praise for their captain. “I’m sure he’s frustrated because he’s a world-class opening batsman,” Swann said. “He’ll pride himself on his performances and want to score big runs. The way he got out today was showing very positive intent.”However, unless England can pull off a record-breaking chase, Strauss’ frustration can only deepen.

'I've always felt comfortable in tight situations'

The master finisher talks about the art of pulling off impossible chases, and his less-than-stellar record in the long form

Interview by Sriram Veera14-Nov-2008

“I always try to say to myself that we are going to lose some matches. I never put too much pressure on myself” © Getty Images
You had a great ODI career. But there was a perception that you had a problem against the short delivery in Test cricket.
A lot of people felt I couldn’t play the short ball. Maybe I put too much pressure on myself to play the short ball well. If I had my time again, I would approach it a little bit differently.I think I didn’t learn much at the start of my career. I think I suffered from the same mistakes over and over again. I think I learnt a lot in the latter part of my career, and I was probably good enough to play for Australia, but I just didn’t get the opportunity as I was labelled with the short-ball weakness. I don’t necessarily see it as a big deal, but I could have made a better fist of it.How did you put pressure on yourself?
I tried to prove to people that I could play, and I put too much pressure on myself and never allowed myself to make mistakes. All those things made it hard for me to move on and get over it. I tried to change later in my career but it was a bit too late. You hired a US biomechanical coach and learned how to hook and pull all over again. Did the acknowledgement that you had a problem with the short ball happen then, or did it come earlier, when you were in trouble early in your career?
No, not really. Even when I was dropped originally, in 1994, I went back and practised the short ball a lot. But the practice was a technical thing. I think the problem was more of a mental thing for me. It was not until 1997 that I realised it was a mental thing.When I hired the biomechanist it was because I had decided that they weren’t picking me in the team because I was ducking and weaving from the short deliveries, and they still thought I had the problem. All I wanted to do was to change the defensive into an attacking option.Later the head of selectors, Trevor Hohns, said your ‘contribution to the one-day side had decreased’, and you were cut out of the team.
I was pretty disappointed. I felt that I hadn’t done much wrong. I had a couple of bad games. But given that I had 230-odd for my country, I thought it was a harsh call. But to be fair, I could see the writing on the wall when they only gave me one year in the last contract meeting. It was pretty obvious that they were looking to move me out. I was very disappointed because the whole decision revolved around the 2007 World Cup, and they didn’t think I would be there. I felt that I should have been given a reasonable period where I didn’t perform. So I was pretty angry about it.You have been spoken of as an aloof person. Jamie Cox, your team-mate, said about you: ‘I played under-age cricket with Michael and even then he had the aloofness, if you like, that a lot of special players have… There’s this zone where they go and you wonder what they’re thinking. You look at them and you know they’re ready to go.’
No, not really. It’s a decision other people make. Some people can also say you are arrogant. I was quite shy and maybe that can be misinterpreted. Another quote on your ‘volatile’ temperament, from the Victoria captain Darren Berry: ‘Although a mild-mannered man, his often violent temper was a room-clearer whenever he got out. He made a mess of many cricket coffins and on occasions would shove his bat and pads down the toilet, flush the button and walk away as he battled his inner demons.’
I don’t necessarily remember that happening but I was always quite an angry person. I tended to get very frustrated after getting out. I did do lots of things that I regret doing at the start of my career and I made a conscious decision that I had to change in the latter half. I felt I had lots of scoring options in ODI cricket, which helped me to get pressure off myself. Pressure is the thing that makes people make mistakes and costs matches What were the things you regretted?
I was getting too angry and aggressive, and getting out was too frustrating for me. That’s just part of the game; you are always going to get out.How would you react now as a coach when you see someone like you – a young Bevan?
I always try to find what their goals are – what they want to achieve. It’s about achieving team goals and creating awareness about the things that will help them get there. I tend not to offer suggestions. I try to get a feel for the player. Only then I can help them.
You were known to pull off incredible wins in ODIs from lost situations. How much does that come down to planning?
I felt that was a strength of mine – planning, strategy and making the right decisions. Even when it looks hard to score, it’s about being disciplined and carrying out your plans. One of my goals was to be there till the end. I figured that if I was there till the end we would win more matches than we lost. Of course, I didn’t score a run a ball every minute, but that was my goal.What exactly do you mean by planning?
It’s a fairly complex process but it’s about playing to your strengths. Choosing the right ball to fit into your strengths, understanding the situation – who is bowling, how is the wicket, what is the match condition – and making the right decisions.Why were you so much better than the rest in those situations?
When I started playing ODIs I felt that I had a good range of scoring options – very similar to an Andrew Symonds or a Michael Clarke. That’s what sets them apart. In that era I felt I had lots of scoring options in ODI cricket, which helped me to get pressure off myself. Pressure is the thing that makes people make mistakes and costs matches. I always try to say to myself that we are going to lose some matches. So I never try to put too much pressure on myself.So in those extreme chase situations the pressure goes off you?
That’s right. I had my personal goals – run-a-ball and this is the way I’m going to do it. That used to be my focus. You always feel a bit of pressure. Its okay to be nervous but you just try to focus on the next ball. When the pressure gets so much that you can’t handle it, then it becomes a problem.Ian Chappell wrote about you, ‘I have never seen Bevan yorked. He often manages to whack attempted yorkers to boundaries.’ Do you get a sense of where the ball is going to be in some situations?
That’s right. Based on the experience of playing in ODI cricket, the field settings, the type of bowler, you do get a feel of where it’s going to pitch. So it’s about having a plan when it pitches there.

Bevan gets yet another fifty: “Even when it looks hard to score, it’s about being disciplined and carrying out your plans” © AFP
Talk us through that game against West Indies in 1996 where you hit a boundary on the last ball off Roger Harper. You were 74 for 7 chasing 173.
You probably think you don’t have much of a chance. It’s great to be positive and all those sorts of things, but you can’t think that far ahead because it feels too big a job. So what you try to say is, ‘Just get through the next period. Try to continue to rotate strike, and give yourself a chance.’ You tend to bat well in that circumstance as you are relaxed. It’s not until you get close to the end of the match and you understand you have a chance of winning or losing that you get nervous again. Glenn McGrath was with you in the final over of the game. What were you thinking?
The key for Glenn was to get off strike and run quickly. It’s very important to be clear how you are going to approach it. He knew what was expected of him and how we were going to do it. As opposed to the situation in the semi-final of 1999, when the South Africans [Lance Klusener and Allan Donald] didn’t have a plan in the same situation.McGrath took a single of the fourth ball. The fifth, you jumped out but drove straight back to Harper. Then there was almost a minute before the next ball. The crowd was screaming and chanting. What was going through your mind there?
I think the second-last ball I had a pretty good idea where I wanted to go: straight. That was my best opportunity, given where I thought he was going to bowl. He bowled a real good ball; if he had bowled another ball like that it wouldn’t have happened. I moved slightly leg side, gave myself some room and was just lucky that it landed on the right spot really.Even early in my career, when a game went down to the wire… I have always felt comfortable and good in those situations.Can you practise for these situations?
Of course, mate. You can practise anything in cricket. It’s about creating good habits, understanding how to make good decisions and taking pressure off yourself.Which one of those last-gasp victories do you cherish the most?
There was the game against New Zealand in Melbourne. We needed 240 or 250 runs and we were six for something. So it was quite a lot of pressure. I thought that situation made it really tough.There was another game against South Africa in the late 90s, where it was another big total – 280 or 290-odd – and we needed to win that to win the series. I made 90 or 100 and was really, really happy.But pound for pound the best innings I have played is for Rest of World against Asia [Dhaka, 2000], for the kind of shots and how I hit them. That was a bit of a buzz. I remember coming out – we needed seven an over and I came in in the third or fourth over. They had lots of spinners, like Murali and Kumble. So there were lots of slog-sweeps and down-the-ground strokes.I was always quite an angry person. I tended to get very frustrated after getting out. At the start of my career I did lots of things that I regret doing, and I made a conscious decision that I had to change in the latter half After you were dropped from the Australia team you had a great year with Tasmania, averaging 97, and you made a domestic-record 1464 runs in the Pura Cup, including eight hundreds.
I just had a number of things that I wanted to achieve. I think I had got a little bit defensive and become a bit too mechanical. I just wanted to relax and see what I was capable of – dominating the bowlers. Those were very good years for me.What would you say was the difference between the young Bevan and the mature version?
There is no difference. I mean, what I did in 2004, where I averaged 97, I did at the start of my career. I was coming full circle. It was about understanding why I did what I did early in my career. I didn’t understand then. When I was young I was confident, positive, and was trying to take the bowlers on. I didn’t have any expectations. I didn’t realise that at the start of my career, but by 2004 I did. That’s the reason I did well.Earlier, I used to practise in the nets a lot, but I was practising for no reason. I didn’t have focus. Towards the back-end of my career I didn’t practise as much because I felt I didn’t need it as much. When I did practise, I really used it well and had goals. It was about working on your technique, getting your body position right or about the match situation.I had great times in my career. I used to have good years and poor years. My ODI career was great. I also had good times in Tests. I had great series against Pakistan and West Indies.With me it was about frustration when I didn’t do well. It was about understanding why I didn’t do well and putting things in place to change that. I really enjoyed my career lot more after the age of 27.

Thiago Silva's son included in Chelsea's list of 2025-26 scholars as youngster looks to emulate legendary Brazilian defender

Chelsea have unveiled their latest group of first-year scholars for the 2025-26 campaign and among the standout names are Reggie Walsh and Isago Silva, the son of veteran defender Thiago Silva. In total, 16 academy players have committed to the next stage of their football development at the west London outfit, reaffirming the club’s ongoing commitment to nurturing young talent.

  • Promising names on Chelsea's scholars list
  • Isago Silva among 16 academy players
  • Brazilian ready to follow in father's footsteps
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    For aspiring footballers at Chelsea's famed Cobham training ground, the pathway to top-tier football is well defined. Legendary centre-back John Terry set the standard years ago and the baton has since been passed to the likes of Reece James, now club captain, who represents the very best of what the academy can produce.

  • Advertisement

  • (C)Getty Images

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Among the newly signed scholars, Isago Silva’s name draws particular interest. The 16-year-old defender joined Chelsea’s academy at the Under-13 level shortly after his father, Thiago Silva, arrived at Stamford Bridge from Paris Saint-Germain. Isago, who can operate as either a centre-back or a left-back, has steadily risen through the ranks. Earlier this year, he made his Under-18 debut in a 3-1 victory over Leicester City. His younger brother, Iago, is also currently part of the Chelsea academy setup, signalling that football talent runs deep in the Silva household.

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    In recent seasons, several names such as Trevoh Chalobah, Levi Colwill, Tyrique George and Josh Acheampong have also followed the same path, moving through the ranks and into the first-team fold. Their presence in Enzo Maresca's senior squad serves as daily inspiration to the current scholars working their way up the system.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • AFP

    WHAT NEXT?

    The continued focus on academy development under co-owner Todd Boehly has been a reassuring sign for those within Chelsea’s youth system. Maresca has already started integrating youth players into first-team training sessions and matchday squads. His approach, combined with the backing from the ownership, has created a fertile environment for young stars to thrive.

ANOTHER Newcastle blow as Anthony Gordon suffers injury scare in pre-season clash with Atletico Madrid as Magpies continue hunt for new striker

Newcastle United have been dealt a major injury blow as Anthony Gordon picked up an injury during a pre-season friendly against Atletico Madrid on Saturday. Gordon, who started as a No.9 in the absence of a main striker, limped off the field with a knock, leaving the fans sweating, although manager Eddie Howe later provided a positive update on the player's condition.

Gordon suffered an ankle injuryLeft the pitch against Atletico in the 84th minuteHowe provided positive updateFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Newcastle have had a nightmare summer transfer window thus far as they failed to land almost all of their attacking targets, including Hugo Ekitike and Benjamin Sesko. Their star striker Alexander Isak is pushing for a move away from the club as the Swedish striker has his heart set on Liverpool.

AdvertisementGetty Images SportTHE BIGGER PICTURE

The Magpies' situation further worsened on Saturday when England international Gordon had to be subbed off after he picked up an injury in the 84th minute of their pre-season friendly against Atletico. The player initially received urgent medical treatment on the field, before he hobbled off the field and went straight into the dressing room.

WHAT HOWE SAID

Amid concerns over Gordon's condition, manager Howe provided a positive update, as he told reporters: "We hope he’s ok. It's an ankle problem. We initially thought it was a muscle. The good news is it's just a twist. The initial feeling is he should be OK."

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Getty Images SportWHAT NEXT FOR NEWCASTLE?

The Magpies will continue to look for a new striker before the 2025-26 campaign. After initial reports claimed that the club wouldn't allow Isak to leave, Howe later hinted that the team has now softened their stance and might sanction a move to Liverpool after all. 

Game
Register
Service
Bonus